top of page
FAQ
Bad Doctrine
Study
Scripture
New Category
This misunderstanding:
• Creates a false dichotomy between grace and Torah
• Ignores that Torah itself teaches grace
• Misunderstands that grace enables Torah observance
• Contradicts Yeshua's own words about Torah's continuity
• Misinterprets Paul's teachings about grace
• Fails to understand that grace teaches us to live righteously (Titus 2:11-12)
• Ignores that we're saved for obedience, not from obedience
This false teaching:
• Ignores that Torah itself teaches grace
• Misunderstands both concepts
• Creates an unbiblical division
• Fails to see how grace enables Torah observance
• Overlooks that YHWH's Law is an expression of His love
• Misses that grace and truth came through Yeshua (John 1:17)
• Doesn't recognize that grace teaches us to live righteously
This teaching is incorrect because:
• No scriptural authority exists for changing YHWH's appointed times
• The Sabbath is an eternal covenant sign (Exodus 31:16-17)
• Yeshua kept the Sabbath and taught proper Sabbath observance
• Early believers continued keeping the seventh-day Sabbath
• The change was made by human authority, not divine command
• The Sabbath is part of creation order (Genesis 2:2-3)
This misunderstanding:
• Contradicts Paul's own statements about the Law being holy and good (Romans 7:12)
• Ignores that Paul himself kept Torah
• Misses his teaching about proper Torah application
• Overlooks his continued Temple worship
• Disregards his statement "Do we nullify the Law through faith? May it never be!" (Romans 3:31)
• Fails to understand his teachings in their Hebrew context
• Forgets that Peter warned about misinterpreting Paul (2 Peter 3:15-16)
This false teaching:
• Contradicts the concept of grafting in (Romans 11)
• Creates unbiblical division in YHWH's people
• Misunderstands the New Covenant (Jeremiah 31:31-33)
• Ignores that there is one law for native and stranger (Exodus 12:49)
• Promotes replacement theology
• Misses that believers join Israel, not replace it
This misunderstanding:
• Takes Mark 7 and Acts 10 out of context
• Ignores that the biblical definition of food hasn't changed
• Misses that unclean animals were never considered food
• Overlooks that Peter still kept dietary laws after Acts 10
• Disregards YHWH's unchanging standards of clean and unclean
• Fails to understand the symbolic language in Acts 10
bottom of page

